Legal Opinion

Franconia Minerals (US) LLC v. United States

District Court, D. Minnesota

Decided February 21, 2017No. Case No. 16-cv-3042 (SRN/LIB)PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER

SUSAN RICHARD NELSON, United States District Judge

I. INTRODUCTION

This matter is before the Court on the motion of Movant Northeastern Minnesotans for Wilderness (“NMW”) to intervene as a defendant. (See Mot. to Intervene [Doc. No. 25].) NMW contends that it is entitled to intervene as a matter of right pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 24(a)(2). Alternatively, it asks the Court to permit it to intervene under Rule 24(b)(1)(B), which governs permissive intervention. Because the Court concludes that intervention is warranted pursuant to Rule 24(b)(1)(B),…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Lujan v. Defenders of WildlifeSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
  2. Mausolf v. BabbittCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1996
  3. Kootenai Tribe of Idaho v. VenemanCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2002
  4. Sierra Club v. United States Army Corps of EngineersCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2011
  5. United States v. Metropolitan St. Louis Sewer DistrictCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2009

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Church v. State of MissouriDistrict Court, W.D. Missouri · 2019
  2. H. J. Martin & Son, Inc. v. Ferrellgas, Inc.District Court, D. North Dakota · 2020
  3. Management Registry, Inc. v. A.W. Companies, Inc.District Court, D. Minnesota · 2019
  4. Murphy v. Minnesota Department of Human ServicesDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 2018
  5. Pavek v. SimonDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 2020

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API