Legal Opinion
Friel v. McCall
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided March 4, 1985PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
— Proceeding pursuant to Executive Law § 298 to review a determination of the New York State Division of Human Rights (division), dated June 12,1984, which dismissed petitioner’s complaint after an investigative finding of no probable cause to believe that respondent Suffolk County Water Authority engaged in unlawful discriminatory practices because of petitioner’s age.
*742Determination confirmed and proceeding dismissed on the merits, without costs or disbursements.
The record before us is devoid of evidence suggesting that petitioner was compelled to retire from his employment with respondent…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- 300 Gramatan Avenue Associates v. State Division of Human RightsNew York Court of Appeals · 1978
- Taber v. State Human Rights Appeal BoardAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1978
- Piekielniak v. New York State Department of HealthAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1982
- Auchenpaugh v. General Electric Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1983
- Murapa v. KramarskyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1982
3Cited by2 opinions
- Wolfson Casing Corp. v. KirklandAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2012
- Masserman v. New York State Division of Human RightsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1988