Legal Opinion

Heyser v. Noble Roman's Inc.

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided August 19, 2010No. 29A04-1002-PL-71PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

SHARPNACK, Senior Judge.

Appellants Kari Heyser, et al. ("the Franchisees"), seek review of the trial court's grant of partial summary judgment in favor of Appellees Noble Roman's Inc., Paul W. Mobley, A. Scott Mobley, Troy Branson, and Mitch Grunat (collectively, "Noble Roman's"). We affirm and remand for further proceedings.

I,. ISSUE

The Franchisees raise one issue, which we restate as whether the trial court erred by granting partial summary judgment to Noble Roman's on the Franchisees' claim for constructive fraud. 1

II. FACTS AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY

On, June 19, 2008, the Franchisees…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Winkler v. V.G. Reed & Sons, Inc.Indiana Supreme Court · 1994
  2. Scott v. Bodor, Inc.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1991
  3. Mid-States Aircraft Engines, Inc. v. Mize Co.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1984
  4. Hockett v. BreunigIndiana Court of Appeals · 1988
  5. Evan v. Poe & Associates, Inc.Indiana Court of Appeals · 2007

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Reiner v. DandurandDistrict Court, N.D. Indiana · 2014
  2. Crystal Valley Sales, Inc. v. AndersonIndiana Court of Appeals · 2014
  3. Gordon v. Bank of New York Mellon Corp.District Court, N.D. Indiana · 2013
  4. Carter v. State Farm Fire & Casualty Co.District Court, S.D. Indiana · 2012
  5. Evelyn Messmer v. KDK Financial Services, Inc.Indiana Court of Appeals · 2017

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API