Rago v. Village of Melrose Park
Appellate Court of Illinois
Bill for injunction. Appeal from the Superior Court of Cook county; the Hon. Arthur H. Chetlain, Judge, presiding.
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Brown
The injunction pendente lite from the granting of which this appeal is taken prohibits the village of Mel-rose Park, and its village marshal, with their officers and agents, from prosecuting the complainant, Dominick Rago, and his employes for the violation of an ordinance set out in the bill of complaint “regulating the construction, alteration, repairing and moving of buildings” until the further order of the court.
It appears to us on an examination of the record that there are very serious questions deserving consideration raised in the cause as to the validity of the ordinance and the…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- City of Chicago v. CollinsIllinois Supreme Court · 1898
- Wilkie v. City of ChicagoIllinois Supreme Court · 1900
- Cornwall v. SachsNew York Supreme Court · 1893
3Cited by7 opinions
- McFetridge v. First Commercial BankAppellate Court of Illinois · 1961
- Simpkins v. MarasAppellate Court of Illinois · 1958
- Fishwick v. LewisAppellate Court of Illinois · 1930
- Mayer v. CollinsAppellate Court of Illinois · 1931
- Young v. Federal Union Surety Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1913
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.