Legal Opinion

DaVolio v. DaVolio

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided December 26, 2012PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

“The child support provisions contained in a stipulation of settlement incorporated but not merged into a judgment of *1121divorce should not be disturbed unless there has been a substantial and unanticipated change in circumstances since the entry of the judgment of divorce” (Matter of Bruckstein v Bruckstein, 78 AD3d 695, 696 [2010]). “A parent’s loss of employment may constitute a substantial and unanticipated change in circumstances justifying a downward modification of child support where the termination occurred through no fault of the parent and the parent has diligently sought reemployment…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Suyunov v. TarashchanskyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2012
  2. Riendeau v. RiendeauAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2012
  3. Kirchain v. SmithAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2011
  4. Rooney v. RooneyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2012
  5. Atabay v. CinarAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2012

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Rubenstein v. RubensteinAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2014
  2. Vasquez v. PowellAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2013
  3. Matter of Bashir v. BrunnerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2019
  4. Matter of Freese v. CasazzaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2016
  5. Rubenstein v. RubensteinAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2014

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API