Dade County v. Michigan Mutual Liability Co.

PEARSON, Judge.

This appeal presents two questions, which must be discussed separately. First, was negligence proved? It is only necessary, upon this question, to report that we have examined the record and find no error in the ruling of the trial judge that the evidence viewed in the light most favorable to the plaintiff was sufficient to withstand defendant’s motion for directed verdict.

The second question requires a statement of procedural facts. This action arose out of an automobile collision in which Elisha N, Gall was injured through the negligence of an employee of the appellant, Dade…