Legal Opinion
Bigsby v. Johnson
California Supreme Court
Decided October 28, 1941No. Sac. 5278PublishedCited by 22 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtGibson, C. J.
The plaintiff brought this action to recover taxes paid under protest under the Retail Sales Tax Act of 1933. (Stats. 1933, p. 2599; Deering’s Gen. Laws [1935], Act 8493; see Revenue and Taxation Code, Part I, Stats. 1941, eh. 36.) The complaint contained twenty-one causes of action upon five of which judgment was rendered for the plaintiff. The plaintiff originally appealed on all causes of action in which the decision was adverse to him, but the appeal brought on his behalf has subsequently been dismissed. The only issue remaining in the case, therefore, is raised by defendant’s appeal from…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Western Lithograph Co. v. State Board of EqualizationCalifornia Supreme Court · 1938
- People Ex Rel. Walker Engraving Corporation v. GravesNew York Court of Appeals · 1935
- Long v. Roberts & SonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1937
- People ex rel. Foremost Studio, Inc. v. GravesAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1936
- People ex rel. Walker Engraving Corp. v. GravesAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1935
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by22 opinions
- Ontario Community Foundation, Inc. v. State Board of EqualizationCalifornia Supreme Court · 1984
- California State Board of Equalization v. GogginCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1951
- Bank of America v. State Board of EqualizationCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1962
- Market Street Railway Co. v. Calalifornia State Board of EqualizationCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1955
- Northwestern Pacific Railroad v. State Board of EqualizationCalifornia Supreme Court · 1943
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.