Legal Opinion

Sperling v. Industrial Commission

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided May 25, 1988No. 1-87-1447WCPublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Calvo

Claimant, Diane Sperling, filed an application for adjustment of claim under the Worker’s Occupational Diseases Act (111. Rev. Stat. 1977, ch. 48, par. 172.36 et seq.), alleging that she contracted hepatitis out of and during the course of her employment with Rush Presbyterian-St. Luke’s Hospital. The Industrial Commission affirmed the arbitrator’s finding that claimant did not establish a causal connection between her employment and her disease. The circuit court confirmed. Claimant appeals, alleging (1) that the Industrial Commission’s determination that a causal connection was not…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Sacred Heart Medical Center v. CarradoWashington Supreme Court · 1979
  2. Roe v. Boise Grocery CompanyIdaho Supreme Court · 1933
  3. Industrial Commission v. Corwin HospitalSupreme Court of Colorado · 1952
  4. Lewis v. Industrial CommissionIllinois Supreme Court · 1967
  5. Byrd v. Industrial CommissionIllinois Supreme Court · 1965

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Madrid v. Lincoln County Medical CenterNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1995
  2. Sperling v. Industrial CommissionIllinois Supreme Court · 1989

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API