Legal Opinion
McCluskey v. Meraux & Nunez, Inc.
Louisiana Court of Appeal
Decided May 8, 1939No. 17029PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
McCALEB, Judge.
A rehearing was granted in this matter because we felt that we had erred in our original opinion when we held that the defendant had the burden of proving that Bayou Bienvenu was a non-navigable stream in order for it to establish- a prescriptive title to the land in controversy. For a full statement of the facts of the case, see 186 So. 117.
Counsel for the defendant has also maintained on this rehearing that we were wrong‘in concluding in our original opinion that the plaintiffs’ title to the land was paramount to the title exhibited by his client and he has urged that this…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Albert Hanson Lumber Co. v. AngellozSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1907
- Baldwin v. Arkansas-Louisiana Pipe Line Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1936
- Nelson, Curtis & Nelson v. BridgemanSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1922
- McCluskey v. Meraux & Nunez, Inc.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1939
- New Orleans Terminal Co. v. LucknerSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1920
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Williams v. Bowie Lumber Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1948
- Wurzlow v. Placid Oil CompanyLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1973
- Pierce v. HunterSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1943
- Valvoline Oil Company v. KraussLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1976
- Pure Oil Company v. SkinnerLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1973
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.