Legal Opinion

Melton Ex Rel. White v. White

District Court, W.D. Oklahoma

Decided March 18, 1994No. CIV-93-1971-APublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER

ALLEY, District Judge.

Before the Court is defendant Prudential Insurance Company’s Motion For Judgment, Permanent Injunction and Attorney’s Fees. Plaintiff has not responded in opposition to defendant’s motion. However, defendant Janice White has responded agreeing to the entry of judgment, but opposing Prudential’s request for permanent injunction and attorney’s fees. The issues are now ripe for review and the Court rules as follows.-

Plaintiff Sandra Melton initiated this action on .behalf of her children, Sheila and Joe White, to recover insurance proceeds from their father’s policy…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. United States v. L. C. ChapmanCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1960
  2. Sun Life Assur. Co. of Canada v. ThomasDistrict Court, W.D. Michigan · 1990
  3. United States v. Major Oil Corporation, Andrew John Brennan, Special Master-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1978
  4. Holcomb v. Aetna Life Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1956
  5. United Bank of Denver, National Ass'n v. Oxford Properties, Inc.District Court, D. Colorado · 1988

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Transamerica Premier Ins. Co. v. GrowneyCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1995

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API