In Re Golding's Estate

Appellant contends that the undisputed testimony overwhelmingly established a case of common-law marriage and every element of such a marriage, and that there was no evidence to the contrary. It follows that the trial court erred in holding that there was no evidence to support the allegations of a common-law marriage between the objector, Mabel Golding, formerly Mabel Wright, and Warren T. Golding, deceased.

It was likewise error for the trial court to order the testimony of Mabel Golding stricken after it had been admitted without objection and had also been elicited by cross-examination. In…