Legal Opinion

Cratsley v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided November 16, 1994No. 93-00407PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Per curiam

Barry Cratsley challenges the revocation of his probation in case nos. 89-5191, 89-6111, and 90-6037. He contends that his guilty plea was not freely and voluntarily entered.

In order for the issue of the voluntariness of a plea to be considered on direct appeal, a defendant must have filed a motion to withdraw his plea in the trial court. Thomas v. State, 442 So.2d 296 (Fla. 2d DCA 1983). Cratsley did not do so.

Accordingly, we affirm Cratsley’s judgments and sentences in the aforementioned cases without prejudice to his filing a motion to withdraw his plea in the trial court.

RYDER, A.C.J.,…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Thomas v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1983

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Traniello v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2002

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API