Frandsen v. Department of Environmental Protection
District Court of Appeal of Florida
1Per curiam
Appellant, Marvin Vaun Frandsen, challenged Florida Administrative Code Rule 62D-2.014(18) as being an invalid exercise of delegated legislative authority. The Administrative Law Judge found that the rule was valid. On appeal, Appellant also argues that Rule 62D-2.014(18)1 is unconstitutional on its face.2 We affirm.
An agency may adopt rules “only where the Legislature has enacted a specific statute, and authorized the agency to implement it, and then only if the (proposed) rule implements or interprets specific powers or duties.... ” State, Board of Trustees of the Internal Improvement Trust…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Grayned v. City of RockfordSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Grayned v. City of RockfordSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Ward v. Rock Against RacismSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Clark v. Community for Creative Non-ViolenceSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- United States v. AlbertiniSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- State, Department of Children & Family Services v. I.B.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 2005
- Frandsen v. Department of Environmental ProtectionSupreme Court of the United States · 2003
- South Marion Real Estate Holdings, LLC d/b/a Oxford Downs, and Darold R. Donnelly v. Florida Gaming Control CommissionDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2024
- State, Dcfs v. IbDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2005