Legal Opinion
Oakdale Mall Associates v. Cincinnati Insurance Company
Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
Decided January 10, 2013No. 12-1148PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
RILEY, Chief Judge.
Oakdale Mall Associates (Oakdale), a Minnesota limited partnership, and Cincinnati Insurance Company (Cincinnati), an Ohio corporation, dispute whether the commercial property insurance policy Oak-dale purchased from Cincinnati covers a loss Oakdale suffered on August 4, 2009. On cross-motions for summary judgment regarding coverage, the district court 1 denied Oakdale’s motion for summary judgment and granted judgment to Cincinnati, concluding the policy excluded Oakdale’s damages. Oakdale appeals, and we affirm.
I. BACKGROUND
Oakdale owned and operated the Oak-dale Mall, a…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Erie Railroad v. TompkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Delapaz v. RichardsonCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2011
- Satcher v. UNIVERSITY OF ARK. AT PINE BLUFF BD.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2009
- Bobich v. OjaSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1960
- Columbia Heights Motors, Inc. v. Allstate Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1979
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Jerry's Enterprises, Inc. v. U.S. Specialty Insurance Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2017
- Devin Nunes v. Ryan LizzaCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2021
- Bedford Internet Office Space, LLC v. Travelers Casualty InsuranceDistrict Court, N.D. Texas · 2014
- General Casualty Co. v. Nelson Engineering Consulting, LLCDistrict Court, D. South Dakota · 2015
- AAAA Investments, LLC v. Twin City Fire Insurance CompanyDistrict Court, D. Nevada · 2025
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.