Legal Opinion

Keith v. Harned v. United States

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit

Decided December 31, 2012No. 11-14095Unpublished

Non-Argument Calendar.

1Per curiam

Keith Harned appeals pro se the denial of his motion to vacate his sentence of 210 months of imprisonment for conspiracy to launder monetary instruments. 28 U.S.C. § 2255. Based on his involvement in a Ponzi scheme to sell promissory notes with no source of income other than the investors’ funds, a jury convicted Harned of numerous crimes including conspiring to launder monetary instruments that were derived from unlawful activity, 18 U.S.C. § 1956(a)(1)(A)®, and that exceeded $10,000, id. § 1957. The jury returned a general verdict of guilty as to the conspiracy, and later the district court…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Apprendi v. New JerseySupreme Court of the United States · 2000
  3. David Ronald Chandler v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2000
  4. United States v. JerniganCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2003
  5. Edwards v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1998

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API