Adams v. State

Russell Adams (Adams) appeals his judgment and sentence entered after a jury found him guilty of committing the crime of aggravated child abuse on his infant son.1 Adams’ defense at trial was that he did not intend to cause injuries to the child, not that any other person caused or contributed to the child’s injuries. The only claim of error raised by Adams in this appeal is that the trial court erred in denying him the opportunity to fully cross examine the child’s mother as to her potential bias or improper motive for testifying on behalf of the State. Finding no error, we affirm.

At the…