Legal Opinion

Chemical Nat. Bank v. Armstrong

U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern Ohio

Decided October 13, 1896PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SAGE, District Judge.

Upon complainant’s appeal the decree of this court in its favor was affirmed as to the amount due as principal, but modified as to the interest. Before the decree of the appellate court was entered, the case of Bank v. Armstrong, 152 U. S. 346, 14 Sup. Ct. 572, was decided. Thereupon the defendant, in view of that decision, petitioned for a rehearing, on a ground of error assigned, but not pressed upon the attention of the court, nor referred to in its decision, to wit, that the court below erred in finding that the Fidelity Bank was indebted to the complainant. The ,…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Bank of Augusta v. EarleSupreme Court of the United States · 1839
  2. Curtis and Others v. . LeavittNew York Court of Appeals · 1857
  3. First Nat. Bank of Charlotte v. National Exchange Bank of BaltimoreSupreme Court of the United States · 1876
  4. Western National Bank v. ArmstrongSupreme Court of the United States · 1894
  5. Tombigbee Railroad v. KneelandSupreme Court of the United States · 1845

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Allis-Chalmers Mfg. Co. v. Citizens' Bank & Trust Co.District Court, D. Idaho · 1924
  2. Hines v. ThurmanCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1922
  3. First National Bank v. Guardian Trust & Savings BankWashington Supreme Court · 1921

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API