Legal Opinion

Ritter v. Commonwealth

Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania

Decided April 25, 1983No. Appeal, No. 1930 C.D. 1981Published

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

President Judge Crumlish, Jr.,

The Unemployment Compensation Board of Review affirmed a referee who denied benefits to Duane K. Ritter (Ritter). We affirm.

*586Bitter embarked, with Ms fifteen-year oM son, on a trip to Texas to find what he called a “good job.” After one week’s work as a gas pumper,1 he quit and returned to PennsylvaMa. He was dissatisfied with the pay and living conditions.2

The Board concluded that Bitter had “voluntarily quit” and was not entitled to benefits under Section 402(b).3 Bitter contends that he had cause of a necessitous and compelling nature for his quit.…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Taylor v. Unemployment Compensation Board of ReviewSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1977
  2. Martelli v. Commonwealth, Unemployment Compensation Board of ReviewCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1981
  3. Michelcavage v. Commonwealth, Unemployment Compensation Board of ReviewCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1981

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API