Crabs v. Mickle

Debt by Mickle against Crabs and his sureties on a bond executed in a replevin suit. Judgment below for the plaintiff for 200 dollars.

The closing paragraph of the brief of the counsel for the plaintiff in error sums up the objections relied upon here, as follows:

“ 1. A cause of action had not accrued when this suit was commenced, the action of replevin being still pending in Court.

“2. The first and second issues should have been tried by the Court, [being, in effect, it is claimed, mil tiel record].

“ 3. The testimony objected to should have been rejected 'as neither relevant to the issue, nor…