Legal Opinion

Jaeger Machine Co. v. Mirau

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided December 15, 1939No. 32,153Published

1Opinion of the Court

Holt, Justice.

Plaintiff appeals from a judgment rendered on a verdict of a jury. Before the entry of judgment plaintiff’s motion for judgment for the full amount claimed in the complaint notwithstanding the verdict or a new trial Avas heard and denied.

Plaintiff advertises itself as the world’s largest manufacturer of road spreading and finishing machines. Its factory is at Columbus, Ohio. Through the efforts of the Minneapolis Equipment Company, acting by its president, A. C. Asiesen, and salesman, B. E. Olson, defendant leased from plaintiff a “Model MP-2 Jaeger Mix-in-Place Boad Builder…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Higman v. CamodySupreme Court of Alabama · 1895
  2. Williamson v. PhillipoffSupreme Court of Florida · 1914
  3. Defiel v. RosenbergSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1919
  4. O'Neil v. DavidsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1920
  5. Standard Oil Co. v. BoyleAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1930

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API