Legal Opinion
Matter of Vill. of Nissequogue v. Suffolk County Dep't of Civil Serv.
New York Court of Appeals
Decided April 2, 1991PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
Memorandum.
The order of the Appellate Division should be affirmed, with costs.
Respondents McHugh and Leigh were appointed to the position of "acting police officer” by resolution of the Nissequogue Village Board in November of 1982 and July of 1984, respectively. Neither was appointed from an eligible list. In July of 1989, respondent Suffolk County Department of Civil Service refused to certify the Village payroll insofar as it authorized payment to McHugh and Leigh contending that they were illegally appointed. Petitioner Village then commenced an article 78 proceeding…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Matter of Hilsenrad v. MillerNew York Court of Appeals · 1940
- Montero v. LumNew York Court of Appeals · 1986
- MATTER OF BD. OF EDUC. v. NyquistNew York Court of Appeals · 1973
- Reis v. New York State Housing Finance AgencyNew York Court of Appeals · 1989
3Cited by7 opinions
- Malone v. County of SuffolkCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1992
- Civil Service Employees Ass'n v. State of New York Department of Civil ServiceAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1998
- Malone v. County Of SuffolkCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1992
- Barnes v. Board of Cooperative Educational ServicesNew York Supreme Court · 1997
- Farkas v. VanderhoefAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2003
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.