Legal Opinion

Fuyao Glass Industry Group Co. v. United States

United States Court of International Trade

Decided September 2, 2003No. Consol. Court No. 02-00282Published

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION

EATON, Judge:

Xinyi Automotive Glass (Shenzen) Co., Ltd. (“Applicant”), has submitted a second application (“Application”) for a preliminary injunction to enjoin liquidation of certain entries of Applicant’s automotive replacement glass windshields (the “Subject Merchandise”) pending a final decision on the merits in the underlying action.1 PPG Industries, Inc., Safelite Glass Corp., and Viracon/ Curvlite, a subsidiary of Apogee Enterprises, Inc. (“Defendant-intervenors”), object to the issuance of a preliminary injunction. The court has the authority to grant the requested…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Railroad Comm'n of Tex. v. Pullman Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1941
  2. Beacon Theatres, Inc. v. WestoverSupreme Court of the United States · 1959
  3. Weinberger v. Romero-BarceloSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
  4. Virginia Petroleum Jobbers Ass'n v. Federal Power CommissionCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1958
  5. Fmc Corporation and Monsanto Company v. The United States, and Rotem Fertilizers Ltd.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1993

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API