Legal Opinion

Roman v. Goldberg

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided December 1, 1927No. 601. [fn*]PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BARCUS, X

Appellees filed this suit against appellant, seeking to recover a real estate commission which they claimed appellant owed them by reason of their having been the procuring cause of appellant’s consummation of an exchange or sale of property which he owned in Waco for some land in west Texas. The cause was tried to a jury, submitted on special issues, and resulted in judgment being rendered for appellees.

Appellant contends by various assignments of error that the trial court erred in overruling his general demurrer and a number of special exceptions which he leveled at appellees’…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Golden v. OdiorneTexas Supreme Court · 1923
  2. Hancock v. StacyTexas Supreme Court · 1910
  3. Texas Employers' Ins. v. JimenezCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1924
  4. W. M. W. N.W. Ry. Co. v. WoodTexas Supreme Court · 1895
  5. Webb v. HardingTexas Commission of Appeals · 1919

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Goodwin v. Southtex Land Sales, Inc.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1951
  2. Murchison v. BallardCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1944
  3. Newton v. McCarrickCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1934
  4. Ware v. Poindexter Furniture & Carpet Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1935
  5. S.A.T. v. StateCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 2016

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API