Legal Opinion
Fidelity New York, FSB v. Hanover Companies, Inc.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided June 18, 1990PublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
In three related actions to recover on promissory notes, the defendants appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County (Morrison, J.), dated December 9, 1988, which denied their motion to vacate judgments entered against them.
Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.
The judgments entered against the defendants were based on three promissory notes. In their motion to vacate those *583judgments, the defendants alleged that one of the promissory notes and a rider bear forged signatures. The defendants do not dispute that the loans were made, and they concede their indebtedness. Their…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Abacus Real Estate Finance Co. v. P.A.R. Construction & Maintenance Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1987
- Central Funding Co. v. KimlerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1976
- Habacht v. CarocciaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1987
3Cited by13 opinions
- Cofresi v. CofresiAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1993
- Fundex Capital Corp. v. ReichardAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1991
- Citimortgage, Inc. v. RoqueAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2022
- Washington Mut. Bank v. BalderaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2022
- Dunkin' Donuts, Inc. v. HWT Associates, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1992
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.