Legal Opinion

Brenner v. Williams-Sonoma, Inc.

Court of Appeals for the First Circuit

Decided August 16, 2017No. 16-2313PPublishedCited by 102 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

TORRUELLA, Circuit Judge.

The would-be appellant in this case, Ronald Brenner (“Mr. Brenner”) sought to amend his late-wife’s putative class action complaint in order to name himself as lead plaintiff. The district court ruled that such an amendment would be futile and Mr. Brenner never became a party to the action. We find that Mr. Brenner does not fall within an exception to our general rule that non-parties may not appeal. Microsystems Software, Inc. v. Scandinavia Online AB, 226 F.3d 35, 39-42 (1st Cir. 2000) (identifying exceptions to the general rule barring appeals by non-parties). We…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Richard F. Davet v. Enrico MacCaroneCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1992
  2. Marino v. OrtizSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
  3. Deborah Fidler v. Eastman Kodak CompanyCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1983
  4. Tyler v. Michaels Stores, Inc.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2013
  5. Harrington v. CostelloMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2014

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by102 opinions

  1. Boniface v. VilienaDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2018
  2. Adriane A. v. O'MalleyDistrict Court, D. Rhode Island · 2024
  3. Amber L. v. DudekDistrict Court, D. Rhode Island · 2025
  4. American Trucking Associations, Inc.; Cumberland Farm, Inc.; M&M Transport Services, Inc.; New England Motor Freight, Inc. v. Peter Alviti, Jr., in his Official Capacity as Director of the Rhode Island Department of Transportation; Rhode Island Turnpike and Bridge AuthorityDistrict Court, D. Rhode Island · 2025
  5. Ana D. v. O'MalleyDistrict Court, D. Rhode Island · 2024

97 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API