Legal Opinion

McEacheran v. Michigan Central Railroad

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided June 26, 1894PublishedCited by 7 opinions

Error to Wayne. (Brevoort, J.) Case. Plaintiff brings error. The facts are stated in the opinion.

1Opinion of the CourtMcGrath, C. J.

Plaintiff delivered to the defendant company two car-loads of lumber, and received a bill of lading therefor, which reads as follows:

“Essex Center, Feby. 13, 1885.
“ Received from D. McEacheran, in apparent good order, except as noted, the packages marked, consigned, and described as below (contents and value otherwise unknown), for transportation by the Michigan Central Railroad Company to destination, if upon said company’s line of railroad, — otherwise, to the place where said property is to be received by the connecting carrier, — upon the terms and conditions on the back hereof, which are…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Detroit & Bay City Railway Co. v. McKenzieMichigan Supreme Court · 1880

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. AJ Tebbe & Sons Company v. Brown ExpressTexas Supreme Court · 1960
  2. Tubize Chattilon Corp. v. White Transp. Co.District Court, D. Maryland · 1934
  3. Pennsylvania Co. v. DicksonIndiana Court of Appeals · 1903
  4. Hartley v. St. Louis, Keokuk & North Western RailroadSupreme Court of Iowa · 1902
  5. Taffe v. Oregon RailroadOregon Supreme Court · 1902

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API