Mintz v. Zoernig
New Mexico Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
VIGIL, Judge.
{1} In this case, we must decide whether a known sperm donor is responsible for child support when there was an agreement, prior to conception, that he would not be financially obligated. We conclude that while such an agreement may be valid in some instances, where the biological father goes beyond merely donating sperm and assumes a parental role, as in this case, he is liable for child support.
FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND
{2} Mother and biological Father met in the mid-1990’s through Mother’s same sex partner (Partner). Father, Mother, and Partner maintained a…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Spingola v. SpingolaNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1978
- Fox v. DoakNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1968
- Unser v. UnserNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1974
- Jhordan C. v. MARY K.California Court of Appeal · 1986
- Ferguson v. McKiernanSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2007
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Jerald W. Freeman, the Tea Leaf Inc. v. FairchildNew Mexico Supreme Court · 2018
- Freeman v. FairchildNew Mexico Supreme Court · 2018
- Aeda v. AedaNew Mexico Supreme Court · 2013
- Soon v. KammannNew Mexico Supreme Court · 2024
- Chatterjee v. KingNew Mexico Supreme Court · 2012
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.