State v. Green
Supreme Court of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
BRANCH, Chief Justice.
The sole question presented by this appeal is whether the Court of Appeals erred in holding that the trial judge erroneously denied defendant’s motion to dismiss both counts of misdemeanor larceny.
We think it necessary to restate the well-established rules governing the sufficiency of the evidence to carry a case to the jury.
When a defendant in a criminal case moves to dismiss or for judgment as of nonsuit, the trial judge must determine whether there is substantial evidence of each element of the offense charged and whether defendant was the perpetrator of the offense.…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- State v. EarnhardtSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1982
- State v. StephensSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1956
- State v. CutlerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1967
- State v. ThomasSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1978
- State v. . JohnsonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1930
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- State v. BartsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1986
- State v. ToddSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1985
- State v. GreenspanCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1989
- State v. ShippCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2002
- State v. HagerCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2010
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.