Legal Opinion

Hedrick v. Quest Diagnostics Clinical Laboratories, Inc.

Superior Court of Delaware

Decided April 8, 2002No. Civil Action 00C-10-187-JOPublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

HERLIHY, J.

In circumstances novel to Delaware law, the motion before the Court puts in clear focus two significant but conflicting principles of public policy. One principle is the encouragement of the reporting of suspected child abuse and immunity from liability of those making such reports. The other is the right of redress, if any, of persons falsely accused of child abuse.

The motion for summary judgment of defendant Quest Diagnostic Clinical Laboratories, Inc., provides that' focus. It is a medical testing facility. It received a urine sample marked with the name of plaintiff…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Brzoska v. OlsonSupreme Court of Delaware · 1995
  2. Coastal Barge Corp. v. Coastal Zone Industrial Control BoardSupreme Court of Delaware · 1985
  3. Bershad v. Curtiss-Wright Corp.Supreme Court of Delaware · 1987
  4. Giuricich v. Emtrol Corp.Supreme Court of Delaware · 1982
  5. Billops v. Magness Construction Co.Supreme Court of Delaware · 1978

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Dennis v. DeJongDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2011
  2. Delaware Board of Nursing v. GillespieSupreme Court of Delaware · 2012
  3. Division of Family Services v. PaddingtonDelaware Family Court · 2003

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API