Legal Opinion

Sprague v. Sowash

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided June 17, 1952No. 18,306PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWiltrout, J.

The sole question presented here is whether the trial court abused its discretion in not granting appellant a new trial by reason of newly-discovered evidence.

Appellees brought this action against appellant on an open account to recover the balance of $198.97 due for feed, grit, and poultry supplies sold appellant.

Appellant filed an answer under the Rules and á second paragraph alleging that the feed was not as represented; that it was not fit for the purpose for which it was sold. He also filed a counter-claim containing similar allegations and requesting damages in the amount of $250.00.…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Hicks v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1937
  2. Franklin v. LeeIndiana Court of Appeals · 1901
  3. Bartley v. Chicago & Eastern Illinois Railway Co.Indiana Supreme Court · 1942
  4. Huston v. VailIndiana Supreme Court · 1875
  5. Gardner v. State ex rel. StottlerIndiana Supreme Court · 1884

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. New York Central Railroad Co. v. SarichIndiana Court of Appeals · 1962
  2. Azimow v. StokerIndiana Court of Appeals · 1960
  3. Silver Fleet Motor Express Co. v. New York Central RailroadIndiana Court of Appeals · 1963

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API