Sprague v. Sowash
Indiana Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the CourtWiltrout, J.
The sole question presented here is whether the trial court abused its discretion in not granting appellant a new trial by reason of newly-discovered evidence.
Appellees brought this action against appellant on an open account to recover the balance of $198.97 due for feed, grit, and poultry supplies sold appellant.
Appellant filed an answer under the Rules and á second paragraph alleging that the feed was not as represented; that it was not fit for the purpose for which it was sold. He also filed a counter-claim containing similar allegations and requesting damages in the amount of $250.00.…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Hicks v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1937
- Franklin v. LeeIndiana Court of Appeals · 1901
- Bartley v. Chicago & Eastern Illinois Railway Co.Indiana Supreme Court · 1942
- Huston v. VailIndiana Supreme Court · 1875
- Gardner v. State ex rel. StottlerIndiana Supreme Court · 1884
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- New York Central Railroad Co. v. SarichIndiana Court of Appeals · 1962
- Azimow v. StokerIndiana Court of Appeals · 1960
- Silver Fleet Motor Express Co. v. New York Central RailroadIndiana Court of Appeals · 1963