Legal Opinion

Holloway v. Donovan

United States Court of International Trade

Decided April 25, 1984No. Court 81-6-00749PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

On the Court's Motion for Review of Administrative Determination upon Agency Record

RE, Chief Judge:

Plaintiffs, on behalf of the former employees of the London, Ohio, plant of Pan-tasote, Incorporated (London plant), challenge the Secretary of Labor’s denial of certification of eligibility for worker adjustment assistance benefits under the Trade Act of 1974. 19 U.S.C. §§ 2101-2487 (1976 and Supp. V 1981). The Secretary found that the former employees of the London plant were employed by a firm that did not produce an article “like or directly competitive” with an article which was adversely…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. United Shoe Workers of America, Afl-Cio v. Catherine Bedell, ChairmanCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1974
  2. MacHine Printers and Engravers Association of the United States v. F. Ray Marshall, Secretary of Labor, United States Department of LaborCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1979
  3. Morristown Magnavox Former Employees v. F. Ray Marshall, Secretary, Department of LaborCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1982
  4. Gropper v. DonovanUnited States Court of International Trade · 1983

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers, Local 1160 v. DonovanUnited States Court of International Trade · 1986
  2. Smith v. BrockUnited States Court of International Trade · 1988
  3. Former Employees of Delco Systems Operations v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 1987
  4. Former Workers, United Mine Workers Local 7925 v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 1989
  5. INTERN. BROTH. OF ELEC. WORKERS v. DonovanUnited States Court of International Trade · 1986

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API