Schmitt v. Pietrangelo
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1Opinion of the Court
In an action sounding in conversion, defendant appeals from an order granting plaintiff’s motion to open a default in the service of a bill of particulars. Order reversed, with $10 costs and disbursements, and motion denied. In Mead v. Consolidated Metal Spinning & Stamping Co. (208 App. Div. 814), it was held that delays of five and two months respectively in moving to open default and to vacate orders for a bill of particulars and of preclusion constituted “ gross laches and inexcusable *1059disregard of the order ”. In this case the delay was more than eighteen months, and under the…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Lawson v. HiltonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1903
- Mead v. Consolidated Metal Spinning & Stamping Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1924
3Cited by4 opinions
- Paris v. PotichaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1956
- Musellam v. FlowersNew York Supreme Court · 1961
- W. R. Simmons & Associates Research, Inc. v. Ziff-Davis Publishing Co.New York Supreme Court · 1962
- Nappi v. Bush Terminal Building Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1956