Lepasiotes v. Dinsdale
Utah Supreme Court
1Per curiam
Appeal from a judgment of the trial court, sitting without a jury, awarding damages and fixing a boundary line in a trespass action, in which both parties raised a boundary line question. Without pointing out any specific errors relied on, defendants maintain that on the whole record the trial court erred in admitting undesignated testimony and in failing to grant a motion to dismiss. And also that the trial judge was biased and prejudiced. From an examination of the voluminous record, it appears that there is evidence amply to sustain the findings and decree, even though the court evinced a…
2Cited by16 opinions
- State v. SteggellUtah Supreme Court · 1983
- State v. TuckerUtah Supreme Court · 1982
- Orderville Irrigation Co. v. Glendale Irrigation Co.Utah Supreme Court · 1965
- Butterfield v. ChaneyUtah Supreme Court · 1961
- Bagnall v. Suburbia Land Co.Utah Supreme Court · 1975
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.