United States v. Julian
Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
PRYOR, Circuit Judge:
The issue in this appeal is whether the district court erred when it held that it was required to impose consecutive sentences on a defendant who committed murder with a firearm in the course of a crime of violence and a drug trafficking crime, 18 U.S.C. § 924(j). Sentences for the use of a firearm in the course of a crime of violence or drug trafficking crime must run consecutive to any other sentences, id. § 924(c)(1)(D)(ii), but section 924(j), which applies to the same conduct that causes death, does not mention a requirement of consecutive sentencing. Jermaine…
2Cases cited25 opinions
- Apprendi v. New JerseySupreme Court of the United States · 2000
- Almendarez-Torres v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
- Ring v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 2002
- Hamling v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Russello v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by31 opinions
- United States v. BerriosCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2012
- United States v. Melgar-CabreraCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2018
- United States v. Cruz-RamosCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2021
- United States v. Jose BranCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2015
- Lora v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2023
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.