Legal Opinion
Roe v. Ingraham
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided February 23, 1976No. 73 Civ. 1303, 73 Civ. 1431PublishedCited by 21 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
ROBERT L. CARTER, District Judge.
Status of Proceedings
This challenge to the constitutional validity of the New York Public Health Law, McKinney’s Consol.Laws, c. 45, § 3300 et seq., pursuant to which under §§ 3331(6), 3332, subd. 2(a) and 3334(4) all prescriptions containing Schedule II substances must be filed with the Bureau of Controlled Substances, Licensing and Evaluation (BCSLE) in Albany on forms supplied by the state is before us on the merits. Plaintiffs seek to enjoin permanently so much of the statutory provisions under attack as require that the names of recipients of…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- Terry v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Katz v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Roe v. WadeSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Griswold v. ConnecticutSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
- Cantwell v. ConnecticutSupreme Court of the United States · 1940
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by21 opinions
- Whalen v. RoeSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- Industrial Foundation of the South v. Texas Industrial Accident BoardTexas Supreme Court · 1976
- Lora v. Board of EducationDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 1977
- United States Ex Rel. Edney v. SmithDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 1976
- Falcon v. Alaska Public Offices CommissionAlaska Supreme Court · 1977
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.