Legal Opinion

PLUS INTERN., INC. v. Pace

Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama

Decided December 20, 1996No. 2950599PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The issue in this case, apparently one of first impression in Alabama, is whether a defendant who unsuccessfully moves the trial court for sanctions against a plaintiff pursuant to §12-19-270 et seq., Ala. Code 1975 — the Alabama Litigation Accountability Act ("ALAA") — is thereafter barred by the doctrine of res judicata from asserting a separate cause of action for a claim of malicious prosecution against that same plaintiff.

In a previous case, James Pace and Eunice Pace sued Plus International, Inc., and others, in connection with a contract between the parties involving a discount buying…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Fontenot v. BramlettSupreme Court of Alabama · 1985
  2. Dairyland Ins. Co. v. JacksonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1990
  3. Winn-Dixie Montgomery, Inc. v. HendersonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1979
  4. PACIFIC ENT. OIL v. Howell PetroleumSupreme Court of Alabama · 1993
  5. Childs v. MISSISSIPPI VAL. TITLE INS. CO.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1978

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Reed v. BD. OF TRUSTEES FOR AL. STATE UNIV.Supreme Court of Alabama · 2000
  2. Oliver v. WoodwardSupreme Court of Alabama · 2001
  3. Walker v. BlackwellSupreme Court of Alabama · 2001
  4. Isobe v. SakataniHawaii Intermediate Court of Appeals · 2012
  5. Wolfe v. JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A.Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 2013

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API