Legal Opinion

Freeman v. United States

United States Court of Federal Claims

Decided September 30, 2015No. 01-39LPublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION GRANTING THE GOVERNMENT’S MOTION TO DISMISS COUNT V OF THE AMENDED COMPLAINT

FIRESTONE, Judge.

Pending before the court is the United States’ motion to dismiss the claims of plaintiff RNR Resources LLC (“RNR”) set forth in Count V the amended complaint in the above-captioned case. 1 The named plaintiff, Walter Freeman, is the sole member of RNR. At issue in this litigation is the alleged Fifth Amendment taking of mining claims in the Rogue River Siskiyou National Forest in Southern Oregon. The mining claims were first made by Mr. Freeman. Those claims were declared null and void by the…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Williamson County Regional Planning Commission v. Hamilton Bank of Johnson CitySupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  2. Karen S. Reynolds v. Army and Air Force Exchange ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1988
  3. Palazzolo v. Rhode IslandSupreme Court of the United States · 2001
  4. United States v. LockeSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  5. Suitum v. Tahoe Regional Planning AgencySupreme Court of the United States · 1997

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Freeman v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2017
  2. Bassett, New Mexico LLC v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2018

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API