Legal Opinion

Hoffa v. Bimes

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided August 7, 2008PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION BY

POPOVICH, J.:

¶ 1 Appellant Robert A. Hoffa, individually and t/a Beaux Chevaux Farm, appeals the judgment of compulsory non-suit in favor of Appellees Randy S. Bimes and Quakertown Veterinary Clinic, PC. Appellant claims: 1) the trial court erred in finding that the “Veterinary Good Samaritan Civil Immunity” Act (hereinafter “Veterinary Immunity Act” or the “Act”) barred any claims against Appellees save those grounded in gross negligence; 2) the trial court erred in determining that consent was not required in advance of Appel-lee Dr. Bimes performing a medical procedure upon…

2Cases cited25 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. LordSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1998
  2. Commonwealth v. CastilloSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2005
  3. In Re Canvass of Absentee Ballots of Nov. 4, 2003 General ElectionSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2004
  4. Krebs v. United Refining Co. of PennsylvaniaSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2006
  5. Sternlicht v. SternlichtSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2005

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Feldman v. HoffmanCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2014
  2. Ruspi v. GlatzSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2013
  3. TW Phillips Gas and Oil Co. v. JedlickaSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2008
  4. Zokaites v. Pittsburgh Irish Pubs, LLC.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2008
  5. Fisher, H. v. American International IndustriesSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2024

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API