Estate of DuCharme v. Commissioner
United States Tax Court
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION.
Hill, Judge:
Issue 1. — Respondent contends that the terms of the trust instrument in question empowered decedent to distribute income or corpus to any or all the beneficiaries in such proportions and at such times as he might determine in his uncontrolled discretion. Respondent’s principal argument, based on this construction of the trust instrument, is that such power constitutes “a power * * * to alter, amend, or revoke” within the meaning of section 811 (d) (2) of the Internal Revenue Code.1
Petitioner contends that the trust instrument did not authorize decedent to so distribute…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Humes v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1928
- Robinette v. HelveringSupreme Court of the United States · 1943
- Commissioner v. Estate of HolmesSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
- Estate of Rogers v. CommissionerSupreme Court of the United States · 1943
- Helvering v. GrinnellSupreme Court of the United States · 1935
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Estate of Loughridge v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1948
- Estate of Loughridge v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1948