Legal Opinion

De Florez v. Raynolds

U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern New York

Decided June 18, 1878PublishedCited by 3 opinions

[This was a bill in equity by Rafael De Florez and another against Charles T. Ray-nolds and others.]

1Opinion of the Court

WHEELER, District Judge.

This cause has been heard on pleadings, proofs, and arguments. The orators are owners of a patent for an alleged improvement in tin preserve cans, originally issued to Jean Bouvet, in letters No. 43.378, June 28th, 1864, assigned to Moritz Pinner, and reissued to him in letters No. 1,804, November 1st, 1S04, and have brought this bill to restrain an alleged infringement, and for an account. The defendants deny the validity of the patent, for the reasons that, as they claim, the invention described in the reissue is different from that covered by the original; that it…

2Cited by3 opinions

  1. Lever Bros. v. PasfieldU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Eastern New York · 1898
  2. Holmes Burglar Alarm Tel. Co. v. Domestic Telegraph & Telephone Co.U.S. Circuit Court for the District of New Jersey · 1890
  3. Keller v. StraussU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern New York · 1898

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API