Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

Umans v. United States

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided December 18, 1967No. 41PublishedCited by 71 opinions

1Per curiam

The writ of certiorari is dismissed as improvidently granted.

Mr. Justice Harlan

would affirm the judgment of the Court of Appeals substantially for the reasons stated in Judge Waterman’s opinion for that court in United States v. Umans, 368 F. 2d 725.

Mr. Justice Marshall took no part in the consideration or decision of this case.

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. United States v. Sam UmansCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1966

3Cited by71 opinions

  1. United States v. Charles T. Bennett, Wilbert Haywood, Elmer Jessup, Henry Stanton and Farris ThomasCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1969
  2. United States v. Cecil Dwayne Evans, Arnold Gene Tate, and Charles Edward Gent, Jr.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1978
  3. United States v. Charles Estepa and Francis VasquezCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1972
  4. United States v. Anthony M. Scotto and Anthony AnastasioCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1980
  5. United States v. Alfred Joseph SamangoCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1979

66 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API