Legal Opinion
Janusis v. Long
Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court
Decided November 27, 1933PublishedCited by 21 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtRtjgg, C.J.
These are actions of tort to recover compensation for personal injuries alleged to have been sustained by the plaintiff, while walking on a public way in this Commonwealth, by reason of being struck by an automobile operated by the defendant Long and owned by the defendant Adamski. The jury found that Adamski was legally responsible for the acts of Long and no question of law is open on that point. The issues now raised are the same in both cases and they may be treated together. Each of the declarations contained two counts, alleged to be for the same cause of action, the first basing…
2Cases cited35 opinions
- Fong Yue Ting v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1893
- Truax v. CorriganSupreme Court of the United States · 1921
- United States v. Wong Kim ArkSupreme Court of the United States · 1898
- Nishimura Ekiu v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1892
- United States v. Ju ToySupreme Court of the United States · 1905
30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by21 opinions
- Charles D. Bonanno Linen Service, Inc. v. William J. McCarthyCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1983
- Baggs v. HirschfieldMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1935
- Rosa v. Partners in Progress, Inc.Supreme Court of New Hampshire · 2005
- Majlinger v. Cassino Contracting Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2005
- Roberto v. Hartford Fire Ins. Co.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1949
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.