Legal Opinion

In re Carpenter

New York County Court, Ulster County

Decided March 12, 1895PublishedCited by 1 opinion

Application by James S. Carpenter, a freeholder, to alter a highway in the town of Marlborough, in the county of Ulster. Certain property holders move to vacate the award *of the commissioners appointed to assess the damages resulting from the alteration of the highway. Denied.

1Opinion of the CourtClearwater, J.

At the October, 1894, term, upon due notice to all persons interested, an order was made appointing three commissioners to determine whether a proposed" alteration of one of the leading highways in the town of Marlborough was necessary, and, if found so to be, then to ascertain and assess the damages resulting therefrom. It is admitted that the notices required by the statute were duly posted in three public places in the town, and were served upon all the persons designated by the statute. These notices, among other things, recited the appointment of the commissioners, the purpose for which…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. In re WilliamNew York Supreme Court · 1839
  2. In re Department of Public ParksNew York Supreme Court · 1889
  3. In re Commissioners of Central ParkNew York Supreme Court · 1868
  4. In re Main StreetNew York Supreme Court · 1893
  5. Mayor of New-YorkNew York Supreme Court · 1819

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. In re RedmondNew York County Court, Steuben County · 1907

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API