Legal Opinion

Dickerson v. United States

United States Court of Claims

Decided November 6, 1939No. 44263PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWilliams, Judge

Plaintiff is a private in the United States Army where he has served as an enlisted man for a period of more than 20 years. On July 21, 1938, he was honorably discharged from a three-year term of enlistment, and on July 22, 1938, reenlisted for a period of three years in the grade of private.

Section 9 of the basic pay act of June 10, 1922, 42 Stat. 625, 629; U. S. C. Title 10, Sec. 633, provides:

On and after July 1, 1922, an enlistment allowance equal to $50, multiplied by the number of years served in the enlistment period from which he has last been discharged, shall be paid to every…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Brewster v. GageSupreme Court of the United States · 1930
  2. United States v. FisherSupreme Court of the United States · 1805
  3. Pirie v. Chicago Title & Trust Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1901
  4. Crawford v. BurkeSupreme Court of the United States · 1904
  5. United States v. LangstonSupreme Court of the United States · 1886

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Blakely v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1940
  2. Strauss v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1940

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API