Legal Opinion · Dissent

Polmanteer v. Bobo

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided April 29, 2005Published

1Dissent

Gorski, J. (dissenting in part).

I respectfully dissent in part. In my view, Supreme Court properly agreed with petitioners that Education Law § 2023 (1) requires respondents to fund “ordinary contingent expenses” as part of the contingency budget of the Cato-Meridian Central School District (District), and that the enumerated ordinary contingent expenses include expenses incurred for “interschool athletics, field trips and other extracurricular activities,” as set forth in the statute.

As the majority notes, at various intervals the Legislature defined and then expanded its definition of the…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Losurdo v. Asbestos Free, Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 2003
  2. Pyramid Crossgates Co. v. Board of AssessorsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2003
  3. Walker v. Board of EducationAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1980
  4. Thomas v. AlleyneAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2002

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API