Legal Opinion

Childerston v. Hammon

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided October 31, 1822PublishedCited by 5 opinions

IN ERROR. Error to the Court of Common Pleas of Franklin county. This was an action of debt on a single bill for 200 dollars, brought by Martin Hammon, assignee oí Abraham Rosenberger, against Richard Childerston and George Krouse, in which a verdict and judgment were rendered in favour of the plaintiff in the court below- ' ■ . The plaintiff having proved on the trial the execution of the bill, the defendants gave evidence, to prove that John Hammon was really the owner of…

Read the full summary

IN ERROR. Error to the Court of Common Pleas of Franklin county. This was an action of debt on a single bill for 200 dollars, brought by Martin Hammon, assignee oí Abraham Rosenberger, against Richard Childerston and George Krouse, in which a verdict and judgment were rendered in favour of the plaintiff in the court below- ' ■ . The plaintiff having proved on the trial the execution of the bill, the defendants gave evidence, to prove that John Hammon was really the owner of the bill, and that it was held in trust for him by Martin Hammon the plaintiff, and then offered evidence, that John…

1Opinion of the Court

The’ opinion of the court was delivered by

TilghmaN, C. J.

This is an action of debt on a single bill for 200 dollars, brought by Martin Hammon, assignee of Mraham Rosenberger, against Richard ' Childerston and George Krouse. The plaintiff having proved th.e execution of the bill, the defendants gave evidence tending to prove, that John Hammon was really ffhe owner of the said bill, which was held in trust for him by Martin Hammon the plaintiff, and then offered evidence that John Hammon was indebted to Richard Childerston, one of the defendants, in a sum greater than the amount of the said…

2Cited by5 opinions

  1. Tustin v. CameronSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1840
  2. Stuart v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1839
  3. Fisher v. KeanSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1832
  4. Cummings v. CummingsSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1843
  5. Frantz ex rel. Garberich v. BrownSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1830

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API