Legal Opinion

Haynes v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Decided December 20, 1989No. 439-87Published

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION ON APPELLANT’S PETITION FOR DISCRETIONARY REVIEW

MILLER, Judge.

Appellant was convicted by a jury of aggravated sexual assault of a child. V.T. C.A. Penal Code § 22.021(a)(l)(B)(i). The trial judge assessed punishment at fifty years confinement in the Texas Department of Corrections. On direct appeal, appellant raised four points of error alleging, inter alia, error in the trial court because the court reporter failed to provide a statement of facts of three pre-trial hearings and the voir dire examination. The court of appeals held appellant waived the right to have these proceedings…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Haynes v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)1987
  2. Grigsby v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1983

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API