Jacobson v. Jacobson
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1Per curiam
There is here a controversy as to the existence, the content and effect of the oral agreement. Whether the contract, if made, is void and unenforeible under the Statute of Frauds (Personal Property Law, § 31, subd. 1), can be best determined upon a trial of the issues.
The order and the judgment should be reversed, with costs, and the motion for summary judgment denied.
Present — Martin, P. J., Townley, Glennon, Untermyer and Cohn, JJ.
Judgment and order unanimously reversed, with costs, and the motion denied. [See post, p. 848.]
2Cited by10 opinions
- Thorp v. Pittsburgh Bicentennial Ass'nNew York Supreme Court · 1960
- Droste v. Harry Atlas Sons, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1945
- High v. PritzkerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1945
- Lenz v. World-Wide Automobiles Corp.New York Supreme Court · 1957
- Droste v. Harry Atlas Sons, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1945
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.