Legal Opinion

Jacobson v. Jacobson

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided June 28, 1944PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Per curiam

There is here a controversy as to the existence, the content and effect of the oral agreement. Whether the contract, if made, is void and unenforeible under the Statute of Frauds (Personal Property Law, § 31, subd. 1), can be best determined upon a trial of the issues.

The order and the judgment should be reversed, with costs, and the motion for summary judgment denied.

Present — Martin, P. J., Townley, Glennon, Untermyer and Cohn, JJ.

Judgment and order unanimously reversed, with costs, and the motion denied. [See post, p. 848.]

2Cited by10 opinions

  1. Thorp v. Pittsburgh Bicentennial Ass'nNew York Supreme Court · 1960
  2. Droste v. Harry Atlas Sons, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1945
  3. High v. PritzkerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1945
  4. Lenz v. World-Wide Automobiles Corp.New York Supreme Court · 1957
  5. Droste v. Harry Atlas Sons, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1945

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API