Legal Opinion · Dissent

Burger v. City of Beatrice

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided January 6, 1967No. 36292Published

1Dissent

McCown and Boslaugh, JJ.,

dissenting.

Judicial interpretation of the term “public use” as applied to the doctrine of eminent domain has been referred to as one of the most controversial and conflicting areas of the law. As indicated by the majority opinion, there are at least two major lines of decision as to interpretation of the term plus another view which takes the position that the term is not susceptible of definition. Some states have adopted one doctrine or the other, and, in many instances, have, at different times, approved both of the main lines of decision as applied to individual…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Vetter v. BroadhurstNebraska Supreme Court · 1916
  2. City of Curtis v. Maywood Light Co.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1939
  3. Lucas v. Ashland Light, Mill & Power Co.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1912
  4. State Ex Rel. Dawson County Feed Products, Inc. v. Omaha Public Power DistrictNebraska Supreme Court · 1962

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API