Legal Opinion

Hohenstatt v. City of Bridgeton

Supreme Court of New Jersey

Decided June 13, 1898PublishedCited by 7 opinions

On certiorari.

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Garrison, J.

The question presented by this -writ of certiorari is the lien period of taxes in the city of Bridgeton, in ' the year 1894. The first step taken by the city to enforce its lien was in October, 1897. Two propositions are advanced by the prosecutor — -first, that the lien is for two years only; second, that if it be for three years, it had expired prior to October, 1897.

In my opinion, the lien is for three years. The charter of the city of Bridgeton does not expressly provide that its taxes shall be a lien at all; upon this subject its…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. State v. Mayor of RutherfordSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1895

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Gillmor v. DaleUtah Supreme Court · 1904
  2. People ex rel. Oswego Falls Corp. v. FosterAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1937
  3. Borner v. City of PrescottWisconsin Supreme Court · 1912
  4. Hallinger v. ZimmermanNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1902
  5. Burnet v. DeanSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1901

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API